By Aisha Marilyn Abdulbary-Knotts | Staff Writer

Protests Against ICE in Minneapolis; Photo via New York Times

Welcome back, Hornets. As syllabi reappear and campus slowly wakes up from winter hibernation, it is tempting to believe that the world hit “pause” while we were away. It did not. Winter break may have offered a moment of personal rest, but politically, the months we were gone were anything but quiet. From federal abuses of power to shifts in state and local leadership, the political landscape we are returning to is more turbulent, more urgent, and more demanding of attention than ever.

Over break, immigration enforcement once again dominated headlines. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations expanded in ways that alarmed civil rights advocates, with reports of aggressive raids, family separations and the continued use of detention facilities that have long faced accusations of inhumane conditions. These actions are not isolated policy choices. They are part of a broader pattern of governance that prioritizes fear over humanity and enforcement over dignity. 

For many students on this campus, particularly immigrants, children of immigrants, and students of color, these developments are not abstract political debates. They are deeply personal reminders that safety and belonging in this country remain conditional.

At the center of much of this turmoil is Donald Trump. Over the past few months, Trump has doubled down on rhetoric that undermines democratic norms, attacks the legitimacy of elections, and scapegoats vulnerable communities for political gain. 

Legal controversies, inflammatory statements, and policy proposals rooted in exclusion rather than governance have become so routine that outrage risks turning into exhaustion. But normalization is dangerous. When misconduct becomes expected, accountability weakens, and democracy erodes quietly rather than all at once.

Yet winter break was not only a story of regression. There were moments, important ones, of political movement that suggest resistance, change, and possibility. In New York, Zohran Mamdani continued to gain national attention as a progressive leader reshaping conversations around housing, public safety, and economic justice. His rise reflects a broader frustration with politics that protect power rather than people, and a growing demand for leaders willing to challenge entrenched systems rather than manage them.

Over break, the world also witnessed an extraordinary and controversial geopolitical event. The U.S. military operation in Venezuela resulted in the capture and removal of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. U.S. forces conducted strikes in Caracas and then brought Maduro to the United States to face federal charges. The operation sparked global reactions, raised questions about sovereignty and executive power, and added a dramatic chapter to U.S.–Latin American relations.

Closer to home, Abigail Spanberger’s inauguration marked another moment of transition. Her leadership arrives at a time when trust in government institutions is fragile, and polarization feels inescapable. While no elected official should be immune from criticism, moments like these matter. 

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger is sworn into office at the state Capitol on January 17, 2026, Richmond. Photo via Getty Images

They signal continuity in democratic processes and the possibility, however imperfect, of governance rooted in service rather than spectacle. For students who feel disillusioned by national politics, state and local leadership often offer the most tangible avenues for change.

Even individual figures who may not dominate national headlines, such as Renee Good and Keith Porter Jr., played roles in shaping the political climate we return to through the circumstances of their deaths at the hands of ICE agents. 

These cases have sparked public outrage, grief, and renewed demands for accountability. Their names are reminders that policy decisions and enforcement practices carry real human consequences, and that the cost of political neglect is often paid by the most vulnerable.

A bullet hole is seen in the windshield of a vehicle involved in a shooting by an ICE agent during federal law enforcement operations on Wednesday in Minneapolis. Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

So what does all of this mean for us, back on campus? It means that political awareness cannot be seasonal. It cannot end when classes do. Universities like ours are not isolated from the world’s problems. They are training grounds for the people who will eventually confront them. 

Whether you are studying political science or biology, education does not exist in a vacuum. The policies debated and enacted over winter break will shape job markets, civil liberties, public health, and international stability long after finals week.

Welcome back, Hornets. The world is still messy, still unjust, and still demanding attention. But it is also still shaped by people who refuse to look away. This semester, staying informed is not enough. The challenge is to stay engaged, ask hard questions, hold leaders accountable, and remember that political change is not something we observe from a distance. It is something we participate in, whether we choose to or not.

Author

  • Aisha is a senior international relations and security studies major from Manassas, Va. After graduation, Aisha plans to pursue a master's degree in foreign services. In her free time, she enjoys singing, writing songs, and traveling.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Welcome back to campus